‘The standard model is not dead’: ultra-precise particle measurement thrills physicists

Physicists have nailed a fiendishly difficult measurement — the mass of the fundamental particle the W boson. The result, from the CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), is in line with the predictions of the standard model of particle physics, and pours cold water on an anomaly in the W boson mass that surfaced in 2022. That measurement had hinted at the existence of phenomena beyond the standard model, physicists’ best description of particles and forces.

Particle’s surprise mass threatens to upend the standard model

“The standard model is not dead,” said Josh Bendavid, a particle physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge and a member of the CMS collaboration, when he presented the result on 17 September. Rapturous applause met the announcement, made at a seminar at CERN, Europe’s particle-physics laboratory near Geneva, Switzerland, which hosts the LHC. The result was ten years in the making, and produced a mass of 80,360.2 million electronvolts for the W boson, which is involved in carrying the weak nuclear force (see ‘The W boson puzzle’). If the finding had been close to the 2022 result, we would be declaring the standard model’s death, said Bendavid.
“The community will be excited by the fact that we can reach this precision and have this understanding of the standard model at this level,” says Florencia Canelli, an experimental particle physicist at the University of Zurich in Switzerland, who works on the CMS experiment but was not involved in the result.
The 2022 result1, produced by an experiment called Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF) at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, used ten-year-old data to calculate that the W boson was heavier than predicted, opening the exciting possibility of a crack in the standard model. Although the model is incredibly successful, physicists know it can’t be complete, because it doesn’t account for mysterious phenomena such as dark matter.

How the revamped Large Hadron Collider will hunt for new physics

The CMS result is the most precise measurement of the W mass to come out of the LHC, and its precision is roughly on par with that of the CDF result. It is also in line with the four measurements that preceded the CDF figure, leaving that value as an outlier. “They cannot both be right,” says Ashutosh Kotwal, an experimental particle physicist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who led the CDF study.
“It would have been probably better for the community if we found something totally different from the standard model, because that would have been exciting for the future of our field,” says Elisabetta Manca, a particle physicist at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was one of the main analysts behind the CMS finding. But in terms of confidence in the result, the value was a “relief”, she says.
The W boson, along with its sister particle, the Z, are involved in radioactive decay as carriers of the weak nuclear force, one of four fundamental forces of nature. Its mass is one of the few values in the standard model that can be predicted with high precision by theory and measured experimentally. This makes it a great way to hunt for cracks in the standard model. “There are not many high-precision observables. That’s what makes it important and worthwhile,” says Kotwal.

Exotic four-quark particle spotted at Large Hadron Collider

But the W mass is extremely difficult to measure. The LHC makes bosons by accelerating protons to produce extremely high-energy collisions. These particles quickly decay into other particles that the experiments can detect. But the W boson decays into two particles, and only one is detectable — a lepton, such as an electron, or its heavier cousin the muon. The other particle, a neutrino, zips straight out of the detector, leaving no trace.
The CMS analysis looked mostly at muon decays. The team reconstructed properties of muons from around 100 million W decays from the LHC with unprecedented precision, says Manca. They then compared the data with four billion simulated collisions and decays that used different values for the W mass — and different values for thousands of parameters that could bias the results — and looked for the best match. “The one that matches is the one we extract,” says Canelli.
The team used cutting-edge software and theory, and calibrated and cross-checked their results with alternative measurements of the W boson and against Z decays to ensure that their methods were working as expected, says Manca.
Because the CMS result is broadly in line with those from other LHC experiments — ATLAS and LHCb — which used different detectors and methodologies, the team has confidence that the figure is correct, says Manca.
No one can yet say why CDF’s result stands out. It’s possible that the CDF detector used different theoretical tools from those in CMS to generate the simulations. CDF detected collisions from a proton–antiproton accelerator called the Tevatron, which closed in 2011, whereas the LHC collides only protons. “There is no one thing where we can say, ‘That’s the reason why the result is so different,’” says Manca.
Kotwal says he will need to see the CMS paper, which will be published in coming months, to see the team’s methodology. “People have been reviewing how we’ve done it, and we haven’t received any clear indication that any flaw has been noticed. The same has to be done for CMS,” he says.
To reach agreement on humankind’s best guess of the W mass, experts from each experiment and theorists will have to come together to try to understand the differing results. “We shouldn’t leave the CDF result as an outlier, we need to understand why or how it is there,” says Canelli.
Although CMS did not find an anomaly, the ten-year process resulted in tools that allow physicists to make other precise measurements. Such high-precision comparisons are what Manca thinks will ultimately break open the standard model.